Corrigendum: Three Perspectives on Human Vulnerability: Enriching Responsible Computing Design Processes

Janna van Grunsven; Naomi Jacobs; Bart A. Kamphorst; Michaela Honauer; Bouke van Balen; Caroline Bollen; Matthew Dennis; Anna Puzio; M. Birna van Riemsdijk

doi:10.1145/3776571

March 19, 2026ACM Journal on Responsible ComputingOpen Access

Corrigendum: Three Perspectives on Human Vulnerability: Enriching Responsible Computing Design Processes

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Share

Key Points

The corrigendum aims to address errors and enhance clarity in the original article about human vulnerability and responsible computing design.
Review of previous article's content
Identification of areas needing correction
Clarification of design process implications
Enhanced understanding of human vulnerability in computing
Improvement in ethical design considerations
Fostering deeper discussion on responsible computing frameworks

Ask about this paper

Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.

Implication

Corrigendum clarifies insights on design processes in responsible computing concerning human vulnerability.

Abstract

This is a corrigendum for the article “Three Perspectives on Human Vulnerability: Enriching Responsible Computing Design Processes” published in ACM J. Responsib. Comput. 2, 4, Article 15 (October 2025), 21 pages.

Discussion

No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.

Cite This Study

Grunsven et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69be368a6e48c4981c6758e6 https://doi.org/10.1145/3776571

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Share

Corrigendum: Three Perspectives on Human Vulnerability: Enriching Responsible Computing Design Processes

Key Points

Ask about this paper

Implication

Abstract

Discussion

Cite This Study

Corrigendum: Three Perspectives on Human Vulnerability: Enriching Responsible Computing Design Processes

Key Points

Ask about this paper

Implication

Abstract

Discussion

Cite This Study

Keep reading

Keep reading