Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Evaluates a machine learning framework for cough analysis in COVID-19, suggesting a novel approach for respiratory disease screening.
The development of AI-driven computational methods has enabled rapid and non-invasive analysis of respiratory sounds using acoustic data, particularly cough recordings. Although the COVID-19 pandemic accelerated research on cough-based acoustic analysis, many early studies were limited by insufficient data quality, lack of standardized protocols, and limited reproducibility due to data scarcity. In this study, we propose an audio analysis framework for cough-based respiratory disease screening research using COVID-19 as a clinically validated case dataset. All analyses were conducted on a single clinically acquired multicentric dataset collected under standardized conditions in certified laboratories in Mexico and Spain, comprising cough recordings from 1105 individuals. Model training and testing were performed exclusively within this dataset. The framework incorporates signal preprocessing and a comparative evaluation of segmentation strategies, showing that segmented cough analysis significantly outperforms full-signal analysis. Class imbalance was addressed using the Synthetic Minority Over-sampling Technique (SMOTE) for CNN2D models and the supervised Resample filter implemented in WEKA for classical machine learning models, both applied exclusively to the training subset to generate balanced training sets and prevent data leakage. Feature extraction and classification were carried out using Random Forest, Support Vector Machine (SVM), XGBoost, and a 2D Convolutional Neural Network (CNN2D), with hyperparameter optimization via AutoML. The proposed framework achieved a best balanced screening performance of 85.58% sensitivity and 86.65% specificity (Random Forest with GeMAPSvB01), while the highest-specificity configuration reached 93.90% specificity with 18.14% sensitivity (CNN2D with SMOTE and AutoML). These results demonstrate the methodological feasibility of the proposed framework under the evaluated conditions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Aquino-García et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: