Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This method predicts thermo-mechanical behavior in complex lightweight structures, indicating improved modeling accuracy.
Accurate prediction of thermo-mechanical behavior in Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM) is often limited by mismatches between idealized Computer-Aided Design (CAD) geometry and path-dependent material deposition. This paper presents a G-code-driven, filament-level modeling and process-simulation workflow for complex geometries and infill strategies, especially toolpaths with in-plane inclinations. Extrusion segments are parsed from slicing G-code to obtain endpoints and process parameters, and each filament is reconstructed as a path-aligned rectangular bead using a dedicated local coordinate system. Progressive deposition is simulated in ANSYS Parametric Design Language (APDL) via an element birth–death method, enhanced by a centroid-based element selection strategy that reduces dependence on strictly aligned hexahedral partitions and improves robustness for complex meshes. A nonlinear transient thermal analysis is performed, and temperatures are mapped to the structural model through an indirect thermo-mechanical coupling scheme to predict warpage and residual stresses. Case studies on square plates with triangular and hexagonal infills (with/without sidewalls and a bottom base) show that the high-temperature zone follows newly deposited paths with peak temperatures near 220 °C, while displacement and von Mises stress accumulate and are strongly affected by infill topology and boundary conditions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: