Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A case-matched study demonstrates comparable outcomes of Preserflo MicroShunt after failed XEN45 Gel Stent implantation, suggesting it as a viable option.
Purpose: To investigate through a case-matched analysis whether failed ab interno XEN45 Gel Stent implantation exerts an influence on the outcome after subsequent implantation of a Preserflo MicroShunt. Methods: In this retrospective study, 70 eyes from 70 participants who underwent Preserflo MicroShunt implantation were included. Thirty-five eyes each underwent primary stent implantation (control group) or had previously undergone failed XEN45 Gel Stent implantation (post-XEN group). The two groups were matched at a 1:1 ratio based on the following criteria: preoperative and maximum intraocular pressure (IOP), preoperative medication score, cup/disc-ratio, follow-up time, and age. Surgery was defined as either “success” or “failure” based on the following three scores: an IOP reduction of >20% and IOP at the longest follow-up <21 mmHg (Score A) or <18 mmHg (Score B) or IOP ≤15 mmHg and an IOP reduction ≥40% (Score C). In all scores, revision surgery was considered a failure. Furthermore, we compared postoperative IOP and medication score, side effects, and revision rate between both groups. Results: Mean IOP decreased from 28.9 to 12.2 mmHg in the post-XEN group and from 27.7 to 12.9 mmHg in the control group, while the mean medication score decreased from 2.1 in the post-XEN group and from 2.6 in the control group to 0.3, respectively. Comparative analyses between the two groups did not reveal a significant difference in postoperative IOP, medication score, side effects, revision, or success rate. Conclusion: Preserflo MicroShunt implantation can be considered a viable option for repeat surgery in patients with bleb failure after prior XEN45 Gel Stent implantation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kiessling et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: