Key result
Combat-related traumatic injury linked to reduced myocardial blood flow reserve, mediated by visceral fat and HRV.
Why the study?
Combat-related traumatic injury has been linked to reduced myocardial blood-flow reserve, but the mediating role of known cardiovascular risk factors was unclear.
Does combat-related traumatic injury reduce subendocardial viability ratio in UK servicemen?
Does combat-related traumatic injury reduce subendocardial viability ratio in UK servicemen?
Visceral fat mass, heart rate variability, and physical function mediate the reduction in myocardial blood flow reserve following combat-related traumatic injury, suggesting physical activity interventions may mitigate this cardiovascular risk.
May warrant physical activity interventions after combat injury; hypothesis-generating, prospective trials needed before clinical adoption.
Introduction Combat-related traumatic injury (CRTI) has been linked to reduced myocardial blood-flow- reserve (MBFR), measured using the subendocardial viability ratio (SEVR). We aimed to assess the mediating role of known cardiovascular risk factors on SEVR. Materials and Methods We examined 1018 UK servicemen (prospective ADVANCE Cohort Study) comprising 504 with CRTI (140 amputees) and 514 uninjured men, frequency-matched at sampling, by age, rank and deployment (Afghanistan 2003–2014). We examined the mediating role of cardiovascular risk factors, shown to significantly greater with CRTI at study baseline (~8 years post-injury/deployment), on SEVR, measured three-years later (FU1). The cardiovascular risk measures were heart-rate variability (HRV, root-mean-square-of-successive-differences [RMSSD]), visceral-fat-mass (VFM, using DEXA), venous-blood high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (Hs-CRP, inflammation), six-minute walk distance (6MWD, physical function) and weekly leisure-time moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (LT-MVPA, physical activity). Results At baseline, VFM was significantly greater and RMSSD, 6MWD and LT-MVPA lower with CRTI compared to the uninjured. VFM and Hs-CRP were significantly greater and RMSSD, 6MWD and LT-MVPA lower in the injured amputees versus the injured non-amputees and uninjured. The SEVR at FU1 was significantly lower in the injured (mean ± standard deviation; 187.2 ± 39.7) compared to the uninjured (194.1 ± 31.5) and lowest in the amputee sub-group (181.9 ± 30.0). The association between CRTI and SEVR was mediated by VFM (natural indirect effect −1.80: 95%CI: −2.90, −0.67), RMSSD (−1.82: −3.45, −0.19) and 6MWD (−1.79: −3.16, −0.41) but not Hs-CRP and LT-MVPA. The association between traumatic amputation and SEVR was mediated by VFM, HRV and LT-MVPA. Conclusions VFM, HRV and physical function/activity were significant mediators of the link between CRTI and SEVR. Interventions on physical activity/function could mitigate the association between CRTI and SEVR. Data from longer-term follow up are required to robustly determine the temporal effects of this relationship.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Boos et al. (2026) studied this question. Combat-related traumatic injury reduces myocardial blood flow reserve (SEVR 187.2 vs 194.1), mediated by visceral fat mass, heart rate variability, and physical function.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: