Key result
Three cardiac software packages predict 1-year MACE with an AUC up to ~0.86.
Why the study?
Myocardial perfusion imaging aids in evaluating left ventricular function for risk stratification and prognosis, but the clinical impact of different cardiac software packages required evaluation.
Do Emory Cardiac Toolbox, Cardiogam, and Myovation Evolution software packages accurately predict 1-year major adverse cardiac events in patients undergoing myocardial perfusion imaging?
Cohort (n=370)
No
Do Emory Cardiac Toolbox, Cardiogam, and Myovation Evolution software packages accurately predict 1-year major adverse cardiac events in patients undergoing myocardial perfusion imaging?
p-value: p=<0.001
Automated myocardial perfusion imaging analysis using Emory Cardiac Toolbox, Cardiogam, and Myovation Evolution provides valuable prognostic information for predicting 1-year major adverse cardiac events.
Supports automated risk stratification in MPI; extends validation across software platforms.
Myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) aids in evaluating the left ventricular function and therefore helps in risk stratification and prognosis. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical impact of three cardiac software packages (Emory Cardiac Toolbox, Cardiogam, and Myovation Evolution) at 1-year follow-up. This prospective investigation involved 370 patients who underwent myocardial perfusion scintigraphy. Participants were stratified into three groups based on left ventricular ejection fraction determined by two-dimensional echocardiography. Among these, 294 patients were available for follow-up at 1 year. Semiquantitative parameters (summed rest score [SRS], summed stress score [SSS], summed difference score [SDS]) and quantitative parameters (defect extent [DE], transient ischemic dilatation [TID], ejection fraction [EF], end-diastolic volume [EDV], end-systolic volume [ESV], and stroke volume [SV]) derived from each software platform (ECTb, Cgam, and ME) were used to evaluate their diagnostic performance in predicting major adverse cardiac events (MACE) using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis in patients during 1-year follow-up. Among the 294 participants available for follow-up, 6% (n = 17) developed MACE at 1 year and 88% (n = 15) belonged to the high-risk group. Follow-up analysis indicated that all three software packages could predict 1-year cardiac events with varying cut-off values, sensitivities, and specificities. Cut-off values for SRS (ECTb) was ≥4 (area under the curve [AUC], 0.82), while for Cgam it was ≥11 (AUC 0.8), DE (REST) (ECTb) was ≥6% (AUC 0.82), and Cgam value ≥4.18% (AUC 0.81), EF (REST) was ≤44% (AUC 0.82), ≤68% (AUC 0.84) and ≤35% (AUC 0.83) for ECTb, Cgam, and ME, respectively, EDV (REST) was ≥137 mL for both ECTb (AUC 0.83) and Cgam (AUC 0.85) while for ME it was ≥116 mL (AUC 0.8), ESV (REST) was ≥91 mL (AUC 0.83), ≥55 mL (AUC 0.86) and ≥78 mL (AUC 0.82) for ECTb, Cgam, and ME, respectively. Majority of the MACE occurred in the group with high-risk characteristics. All three software packages demonstrated the ability to predict 1-year cardiac events, albeit with varying parameter cut-off values, sensitivities, and specificities.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Paul et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Cardiovascular disease (n=370). Myocardial perfusion imaging software (ECTb, Cardiogam, Myovation Evolution) vs. Comparison between software packages was evaluated on Major adverse cardiac events (MACE) at 1 year (p=<0.001). Three cardiac software packages (ECTb, Cardiogam, and Myovation Evolution) predicted 1-year major adverse cardiac events with AUCs ranging from 0.79 to 0.86 using varying parameter cut-off values.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: