Retrospective analysis shows high virological effectiveness in people with HIV switching to B/F/TAF, suggesting a preferred option over NNRTIs.
Extensive real-world data in people with HIV (PWH) switching from non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs), in particular from rilpivirine (RPV)-based regimens to bictegravir/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide (B/F/TAF), are lacking. This is a single-center retrospective study. Inclusion criteria were PWH aged ≥ 18 years, virologically suppressed on NNRTI triple antiretroviral regimens. The primary endpoint was the proportion of PWH with HIV-RNA < 50 cp/mL at 12 months from time of switch to B/F/TAF. Overall, 214 PWH were included, of whom 105 (49.1%) were switching from RPV/FTC/TAF. After 12 months, the proportion of PWH with HIV-RNA < 50 copies/mL was 82.7% (95% confidence interval, CI, 77.1–87.2) at intention-to-treat (ITT) and 95.7% (95% CI 91.7–97.8) at missing=excluded (M=E) analysis. In the group switching from RPV/FTC/TAF, the proportion of PWH with HIV-RNA < 50 copies/mL at 12 months was 74.3% (95% CI 65.2–81.7) at ITT and 95.1% (95% CI 88.1–98.1) at M=E analysis. Two PWH (0.93%, 95% CI 0.26–3.34) experienced virological failure after switching to B/F/TAF, with no resistance mutations detected. Six treatment discontinuations were observed (2.8%, 95% CI 1.3–5.6). A decrease in low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol was documented when switching from RPV/FTC/TAF to B/F/TAF. Switching to B/F/TAF from NNRTI-based regimens, particularly if RPV-based, showed high virological effectiveness and rare treatment discontinuations. No resistance mutations were detected at failure.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gagliardini et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: