Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Pilot quasi-experimental study demonstrates improved tube weaning in young children using remote monitoring, suggesting potential benefits for pediatric care.
Objective: Feeding-tube weaning is conducted in both inpatient and outpatient settings, with significant logistical, financial, and structural barriers to both approaches. We sought to assess whether remote patient monitoring (RPM), using a mobile application, which would overcome many of these barriers, could be effective in helping patients tube wean. Methods: We prospectively enrolled patients with a feeding tube, aged 0–3 years. Enrolled families entered data daily into the remote application. Data were monitored by a nurse and reviewed weekly by a multidisciplinary team. A standard hunger provocation protocol was used, paired with medical, behavioral, oral motor, and nutrition interventions, as needed. We conducted a retrospective chart review to identify a comparison cohort. The chart review was collected first, then compared to the prospective, non-randomized trial of RPM tube weaning. Results: The chart review identified 141 children seen with a feeding tube from January 2023–June 2023. Of those, 17 children attempted a tube wean. The post-intervention group consisted of 38 children prospectively enrolled from the same clinic between November 2023–2024. In the pre-intervention group, 41% of the children (7/17) were successful in achieving all calories by mouth and 90% of children (34/38) in the post-intervention group were successful in tube weaning. Conclusions: RPM is a feasible and incredibly promising model for feeding-tube weaning in pediatric patients with a wide range of medical comorbidities, including patients with multiple comorbidities. RPM allowed for high-quality medical monitoring and for a dynamic intervention in response to patient data transferred to the medical team in real time.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Edwards et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: