Systematic review investigates non-pharmaceutical interventions for young-onset dementia and caregivers, revealing limited effectiveness.
Background Young-onset dementia (YOD) causes major life disruptions and emotional strain for both persons living with YOD and their informal caregivers. Non-pharmaceutical interventions may help to improve quality of life and reduce stress. Objective We aimed at investigating the effects of non-pharmaceutical interventions for persons living with YOD and their informal caregivers and to explore the intervention characteristics. Methods We conducted a systematic review including randomized and non-randomized controlled trials (PROSPERO: CRD42025645744). We searched major bibliographic databases and performed citation and web searches. Two reviewers independently screened titles, abstracts, and full texts. For data extraction, we used Elicit, an artificial intelligent research assistant; with extractions confirmed by a human reviewer. The methodological quality was assessed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT). We performed a narrative synthesis based on a harvest plot. When appropriate, we performed meta-analyses. Results We found 9 trials assessing interventions on education and information or skills building interventions that were published between 1990 and 2024 (median sample size: 58). Meta-analyses revealed no statistically significant impact on behavioral outcomes, activities of daily living, and quality of life of persons living with YOD and no statistically significant impact on burden, depression and anxiety, and quality of life of informal caregivers. Conclusions Evidence on the effectiveness of non-pharmaceutical interventions for persons living with YOD and their informal caregivers is limited and inconsistent. Further, larger, and multiple randomized controlled trials assessing the impact of non-pharmaceutical interventions with comparable outcomes, standardized measurements, and longer follow-ups are needed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vogt et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: