Evaluation shows reduced sensitivity of Sōna GM LFA for cryptic Aspergillus species in patients with pulmonary infections.
Background Although Aspergillus fumigatus remains the primary cause of invasive aspergillosis, other species—including emerging cryptic ones—are increasingly identified in clinical settings. These species often exhibit distinct antifungal susceptibility profiles, emphasising the importance of species‐level identification for effective patient management. Galactomannan, once considered specific to A. fumigatus , is now widely used for aspergillosis diagnosis regardless of species. However, its performance in detecting non‐ fumigatus infections remains insufficiently characterised. Objective To evaluate the diagnostic performance of the Sōna GM LFA (IMMY) in BAL samples from patients with pulmonary infections attributed to different Aspergillus spp., including cryptic species. Methods We evaluated the diagnostic performance of the Sōna galactomannan LFA (IMMY) in bronchoalveolar lavage samples from 49 patients (15% paediatric) with probable invasive aspergillosis or COVID‐associated pulmonary aspergillosis, confirmed by microscopy and culture. Results The etiologic agents comprised A. fumigatus sensu stricto (46.9%), A. terreus ss. (16.3%), A. flavus ss. (16.3%), A. niger ss. (6.1%), A. nidulans (4.1%) and five cryptic species (10.2%). Galactomannan index values varied across species and clinical group, with particularly low readings (0.09–0.31) in six cases (five involving cryptic species), suggesting reduced assay sensitivity for cryptic taxa. Paediatric samples also showed lower galactomannan levels compared to adults. Conclusions This study highlights the limitations of galactomannan assays in detecting cryptic Aspergillus infections, showing consistently low galactomannan levels in BAL. Multicenter studies are needed to validate findings and refine clinical algorithms.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Loaiza‐Oliva et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: