PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 21, 2026JAMA Dermatology2 citationsOpen Access

Lutikizumab in Adults With Moderate to Severe Hidradenitis Suppurativa After Anti-TNF Therapy Failure

AKAlexa B. KimballKSKonrad Teodor SawickiLALindsay Ackerman

Key Points

  • This research aims to assess the efficacy of lutikizumab in adults with moderate to severe hidradenitis suppurativa who have not responded to anti-TNF therapy.
  • Conducted a clinical trial for adults with hidradenitis suppurativa
  • Participants had previously failed anti-TNF therapy
  • Administered lutikizumab and monitored effects
  • Efficacy of lutikizumab observed in reducing symptoms of hidradenitis suppurativa
  • Participants showed improvement in condition after treatment
  • Significant changes measured from baseline assessments

Abstract

Importance Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a debilitating inflammatory skin disease with limited therapeutic options. Objective To assess the efficacy and safety of lutikizumab, a dual-variable domain interleukin 1α/1β antagonist, for adult participants with moderate to severe HS who experienced anti–tumor necrosis factor (TNF) therapy failure. Design, Setting, and Participants This phase 2, double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial was conducted at 45 sites in 8 countries or territories (Australia, Canada, Germany, Greece, Japan, Puerto Rico, Spain, and the US) between December 28, 2021, and November 27, 2023, and included a 35-day screening period, a 16-week treatment period, and a 9-week safety follow-up. Data were analyzed in December 2023. Participants 18 years or older with a diagnosis of HS for 12 months or longer who experienced anti-TNF treatment failure were enrolled. Interventions Eligible participants were randomized 1:1:1:1 to receive lutikizumab, 300 mg, every week; lutikizumab, 300 mg, every other week; lutikizumab, 100 mg, every other week; or placebo, every week. The trial drug was administered starting at baseline and through week 16. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary end point was achieving a Hidradenitis Suppurativa Clinical Response (HiSCR 50) at week 16. The secondary efficacy objective was achieving at least a 30% reduction and at least 1-unit reduction from baseline in Patient's Global Assessment of skin pain (Numerical Rating Scale NRS 30) after 16 weeks of treatment among among patients with a baseline NRS 3 or greater. Additional end points included achieving HiSCR 75 and HiSCR 90, change and percentage change from baseline in draining tunnels, and change from baseline in Dermatology Life Quality Index total scores. Results A total of 153 participants received at least 1 dose of the trial medication (94 female individuals 61.4%; mean range age, 40.5 19-75 years; 108 patients 70.6% at Hurley stage III). At week 16, 19 (48.7%), 22 (59.5%), and 10 participants (27.0%) receiving lutikizumab, 300 mg, every week; lutikizumab, 300 mg, every other week; and lutikizumab, 100 mg, every other week, respectively, achieved HiSCR50 at week 16 compared with placebo (35.0%); posterior probabilities of positive treatment effect vs placebo were 89.3%, 98.5%, and 22.8%, respectively, using a bayesian analysis. Among participants with baseline NRS scores of 3 or greater, 10 (34.5%) who received lutikizumab, 300 mg, every other week and 8 (34.8%) who received lutikizumab, 300 mg, every week achieved an NRS30 response compared with 4 (12.9%) who received placebo. There were no deaths or treatment-emergent adverse events of neutropenia, serious hypersensitivity reactions, major adverse cardiovascular events, or opportunistic infections reported. Conclusions and Relevance In this phase 2 randomized clinical trial, lutikizumab, 300 mg, every week and 300 mg every other week showed positive treatment effects vs placebo in a hard-to-treat moderate to severe HS population that experienced anti-TNF therapy failure. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05139602

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Kimball et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69be372b6e48c4981c67690dhttps://doi.org/10.1001/jamadermatol.2026.0155
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper