Key result
Cluster resistance training yields lower perceived exertion and greater enjoyment vs traditional training.
Why the study?
This study was conducted to compare the acute effects of traditional versus cluster resistance training protocols on affective valence, arousal, enjoyment, and rating of perceived exertion in resistance-trained young adults.
Does a cluster resistance training protocol improve affective valence, arousal, enjoyment, and rating of perceived exertion compared to traditional resistance training in resistance-trained young adults?
RCT (n=16)
Crossover
Does a cluster resistance training protocol improve affective valence, arousal, enjoyment, and rating of perceived exertion compared to traditional resistance training in resistance-trained young adults?
Cluster resistance training elicits more favorable affective and perceptual responses than traditional training, potentially enhancing exercise enjoyment and adherence.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May warrant cluster protocols to boost adherence in trained adults; extends RCT evidence for superior perceptual responses.
de Souza Soares, B, Mohammad, J, Cantelmo, CE, Gomes Alves, MC, de Oliveira Barros, BC, and Vieira de Oliveira, G. Feelings in the lift: Comparing perceptual responses to cluster and traditional resistance training protocols. J Strength Cond Res XX(X): 000-000, 2025-This study compared the acute effects of traditional vs. cluster resistance training (RT) protocols on affective valence, arousal, enjoyment, and rating of perceived exertion (RPE) in resistance-trained young adults. Sixteen subjects completed 2 lower-limb RT sessions in a randomized crossover design: 1 with a traditional configuration and another with cluster sets. Affective valence declined during and after the traditional session (p < 0.05), but remained stable across time in the cluster session, with a significant protocol × time interaction (p < 0.001). Perceived activation increased in both conditions (p < 0.001) but was significantly higher after the traditional protocol (p = 0.04; d = 0.7, 95% confidence interval (CI) [0.12-1.21]). Enjoyment was significantly greater (p < 0.01; d = 0.7, 95% CI [-1.31 to -0.18]), and RPE significantly lower (p < 0.001; d = 1.2, 95% CI [0.52-1.82]) following the cluster session. Rating of perceived exertion negatively correlated with enjoyment (r = -0.54, p = 0.03) and affective valence (r = -0.54, p = 0.032) in the traditional condition. These results suggest that RT set configuration acutely modulates psychoaffective outcomes. Cluster RT elicits more favorable affective and perceptual responses, which may enhance exercise enjoyment and support long-term adherence.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Soares et al. (2026) conducted an RCT in Resistance training (n=16). Cluster resistance training vs. Traditional resistance training was evaluated on Affective valence, arousal, enjoyment, and rating of perceived exertion (RPE) (d = 1.2 (for RPE), 95% CI 0.52-1.82, p=<0.001). Cluster resistance training elicited significantly lower perceived exertion (d = 1.2, 95% CI 0.52-1.82, p < 0.001) and greater enjoyment compared to traditional resistance training.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: