Demonstrates how water suppression techniques influence metabolite quantification in healthy subjects, indicating a vital measurement consideration.
Purpose This study investigates the effect of VAPOR water suppression and metabolite cycling on metabolite quantification and macromolecules in proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Methods Single‐voxel semi‐LASER spectra ( T R / T E = 3000/28 ms) and metabolite‐nulled spectra (macromolecules) were acquired in five healthy subjects in the posterior cingulate cortex at 3 T using two different water suppression schemes: VAPOR or metabolite cycling (MC). Post‐processed spectra were quantified using LCModel. Metabolites concentrations were compared between the two schemes. Results Region specific differences in macromolecule resonances were observed and the concentration of most metabolites was significantly higher when using MC compared to VAPOR. The difference was most pronounced for total creatine (−14% with VAPOR vs. MC, p < 0.05). Conclusion The macromolecules spectrum included in the LCModel basis set must be measured with the same water suppression scheme as the metabolite spectrum for accurate quantification.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Deelchand et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: