This approach demonstrates selective artifact reduction in single-channel EEG using noise regression techniques, highlighting its utility for BCI applications.
EEG is often contaminated by ocular (EOG) and muscle (EMG) artifacts, yet many pipelines apply uniform denoising, risking distortion of clean neural activity. We propose a two-head, single-channel regressor that estimates EOG and EMG noise-to-signal ratio (NSR, dB) from short segments and test whether it can guide selective artifact reduction, including downstream BCI decoding. Approach. Using EEGdenoiseNet clean EEG and artifact exemplars, we synthesised 2-s single-channel mixtures with known EOG/EMG NSR spanning -10 to +10 dB and trained several model families to jointly regress both NSRs. Generalisation was evaluated on an independent eyeblink dataset via agreement with regression-based ocular-reference topographies, and in two applications: (i) gating stationary wavelet blink removal on a P3 ERP dataset and (ii) gating the same denoiser on a 55-subject RSVP P300 speller dataset (FP1/FP2). Main results. A dilated temporal convolutional network (TCN) performed best (EOG: MAE ≈ 1.8 dB, R² ≈ 0.82; EMG: MAE ≈ 1.0 dB, R² ≈ 0.94) with low bias across NSR. The EOG head recovered blink topographies (median spatial correlation ≈ 0.91). On the P3 dataset, indiscriminate wavelet denoising reduced significant ERP channels, whereas TCN-guided gating preserved 22-23 of 24 while processing ~9-20% of segments. On the speller dataset, denoising all epochs reduced decoding, while selective denoising improved AUC (θ = 9 dB: ΔAUC = 0.327, p = 0.0040) while denoising 12.45 ± 9.29% of test segments. Significance. Multi-head noise regression provides interpretable, continuous ocular and muscle contamination estimates that can act as control signals for conservative, noise-aware artifact handling under constrained-lead conditions. .
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shaikh et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: