Automated measurement enhances vertebral HU agreement in an external cohort, suggesting improved efficiency.
Manual single-slice lumbar quantitative computed tomography (QCT) depends on operator-driven slice selection and trabecular region-of-interest (ROI) placement. We developed a fully automated single-slice workflow for vertebral trabecular Hounsfield unit (HU) measurement that combines unsuitable-slice prescreening, dual-purpose segmentation, intra-patient slice-quality ranking, and a deterministic inner ROI rule. The pipeline includes an Eligibility Gate, QC-Envelope segmentation for broad, vertebral- and usability-preserving delineation, PairRank-Swin for best-slice selection, and dedicated trabecular segmentation for final quantitative analysis. In the independent external cohort, 4 cases were considered non-evaluable by both manual review and the pipeline, and 2 additional borderline-quality cases were manually measured but rejected by the pipeline; therefore, paired HU agreement analysis included 44 evaluable cases. Agreement remained high, with Pearson’s r = 0.987, Lin’s CCC = 0.985, mean bias −0.44 HU, and limits of agreement from −14.88 to +13.99 HU. Coverage was 84.1% within ±10 HU and 97.7% within ±15 HU. Ablation analysis showed that slice ranking and ROI erosion were the most critical components. In an open module-level baseline comparison, QC-Envelope segmentation substantially outperformed TotalSegmentator. This workflow provides high agreement with expert HU measurement while preserving reviewable intermediate outputs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ye et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: