PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 21, 2026International Journal of Infectious Diseases2 citationsOpen Access

A global evaluation of the use of faecal microbiota transplant (FMT)

View Full Paper
BMBlair MerrickBMB MullishSGSimon Goldenberg

Key Points

  • This evaluation aims to provide a comprehensive global overview of faecal microbiota transplant (FMT) practices and access across different countries.
  • Conducted an electronic survey targeting gastroenterology and infectious disease professionals.
  • Analyzed responses descriptively and with statistical methods.
  • Collected responses from 80 participants across 55 countries.
  • FMT availability was significantly higher in Tier 1/2 nations compared to Tier 3/4 nations (24/28 vs 8/27, p<0.001).
  • Countries lacking FMT access cited reasons such as infrastructure issues, financial constraints, and regulatory uncertainty.
  • Most countries using FMT primarily treated Clostridioides difficile infections, with different criteria for treatment initiation.

Abstract

AbstractBackground Faecal microbiota transplant (FMT) is an effective therapy for recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI); its use is increasingly being investigated for other indications. Although regional surveys and national registries have provided insight into local practices, a comprehensive global overview of FMT access, implementation and governance is lacking. Methods A survey regarding key aspects related to FMT use was disseminated electronically to members of the World Gastroenterology Organisation, European FMT Network, and International Society of Infectious Diseases. Responses were analysed both descriptively and using appropriate statistical methods. Findings 80 responses were obtained from 55 countries. FMT was available in significantly more Tier 1/2, than Tier 3/4, nations (24/28 vs 8/27; pInterpretation This is the first global overview of FMT availability and governance, highlighting substantial international inequities and considerable heterogeneity in regulation, clinical use, donor screening, and cost. Standardisation of practice and targeted support for lower income countries is needed to ensure equitable access and to promote safe, high-quality delivery as FMT and microbiome-based therapeutics continue to evolve.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Merrick et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69be37506e48c4981c676d0chttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2026.108574
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper