An investigation reveals issues with irrelevant citations requested during the peer-review process, affecting the article's integrity.
An investigation conducted on behalf of the journal by Elsevier's Research Integrity & Publishing Ethics team has determined the authors were requested by one of the reviewers to insert irrelevant references to their paper during the peer-review process. As these citations were requested by an individual who could influence the decision to accept the article, the authors are not considered at fault for the addition of these citations. The Editors have determined that the citations added to the paper at the request of the reviewers does not offer a balanced reflection of the literature.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
A 2026 study studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: