The rapid adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) across public services and critical infrastructure is reshaping digital governance. While AI promises efficiency and innovation, its reliance on large, high-dimensional datasets introduces privacy, bias, transparency and accountability risks that existing frameworks struggle to address. This study evaluates the maturity of current AI governance frameworks and develops an integrated risk-tiering model that connects ethical principles to auditable technical controls, aligning with Sustainable Development Goal 9 on industry, innovation and infrastructure. A systematic literature review of 450 records from major databases was conducted using PRISMA 2020 guidelines; 95 high-quality studies were analyzed using principal component analysis and k-means clustering. The analysis produced a heat map of governance frameworks, a co-occurrence network of themes, a cluster analysis of framework coverage and an integrated governance risk framework supported by a risk-tiering matrix. Findings reveal a fragmented landscape dominated by ethics/privacy-centric and compliance/risk-focused approaches, with few integrated frameworks and evident tension between privacy and security. This synthesis bridges the gap between values and practice, offering a policy-ready model for secure and sustainable AI governance.
Albulayhi et al. (Wed,) studied this question.