Demonstrates a novel method to accurately predict the health state of aero-engine fuel metering units, indicating improved flight safety and maintenance efficiency.
As a critical actuator in aero-engine control systems, the health condition of the Fuel Metering Unit (FMU) directly influences flight safety and maintenance efficiency, making the precise prediction of its degradation process a core task in the engine’s Prognostic and Health Management (PHM). This paper presents a novel inverted stabilized LSTM-Transformer (isLTransformer) approach for predicting the health state of aero-engine FMUs, addressing the limitations of existing methods in modeling long-sequence multivariate data. Firstly, a Composite Health Indicator (CHI) is constructed through semi-supervised learning (SSL), which fuses multi-sensor monitoring data to quantitatively characterize the degradation trend of the FMU throughout its operational lifecycle. Secondly, the proposed isLTransformer model is designed by replacing the feedforward network in traditional iTransformer with a stabilized LSTM module, which maintains the self-attention mechanism’s capability to explicitly model dynamic correlations between multiple variables while enhancing the ability to capture nonlinear degradation within individual variables. A physical FMU test bench is designed for the real-world PHM degradation experiments, and the collected dataset was used to demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed method. Evaluation metrics, including Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) and Mean Absolute Error (MAE), are employed to assess the prediction accuracy. The proposed method demonstrates high monotonicity and trend consistency in CHI construction. Compared to the inverted Transformer (iTransformer) and iTransformer- Bi-directional Long Short-Term Memory (BiLSTM), the proposed isLTransformer framework demonstrates significantly reduced prediction errors, validating its superiority in multivariate long-sequence prediction tasks and effectiveness for aero-engine FMU health prediction.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Huang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: