PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 21, 2026Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment3 citations

LEAD: Iterative Data Selection for Efficient LLM Instruction Tuning

View Full Paper
XLXiaotian LinYQYanlin QiYZYizhang Zhu

Key Points

  • To enhance the efficiency and effectiveness of instruction tuning in large language models by optimizing data selection processes.
  • Proposed LEAD framework for data selection within the training loop.
  • Introduced Instance-Level Dynamic Uncertainty (IDU) to estimate sample utility.
  • Implemented a two-stage selection strategy utilizing a multi-armed bandit mechanism.
  • LEAD improved model performance by 6.1%-10.8% over existing methods.
  • Utilized only 2.5% of the training data.
  • Reduced overall training time by 5–10 times.

Abstract

Instruction tuning has emerged as a critical paradigm for improving the capabilities and alignment of large language models (LLMs). However, existing iterative model-aware data selection methods incur significant computational overhead, as they rely on repeatedly performing full-dataset model inference to estimate sample utility for subsequent training iterations. In this paper, we propose LEAD, a framework that LEArns to select Data iteratively by accurately estimating sample utility entirely within the standard training loop, eliminating the need for additional model inference. At its core, LEAD introduces Instance-Level Dynamic Uncertainty (IDU), a theoretically grounded utility function combining instantaneous training loss, gradient-based approximation of loss changes, and exponential smoothing of historical loss signals. To further scale efficiently to large datasets, LEAD employs a two-stage, coarse-to-fine selection strategy, adaptively prioritizing informative clusters through a multi-armed bandit mechanism, followed by precise fine-grained selection of high-utility samples using IDU. Extensive experiments across four diverse benchmarks show that LEAD significantly outperforms state-of-the-art methods, improving average model performance by 6.1%-10.8% while using only 2.5% of the training data and reducing overall training time by 5–10×.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Lin et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69be37ce6e48c4981c677b6bhttps://doi.org/10.14778/3778092.3778103
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper