PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 21, 2026Analytical Chemistry2 citationsOpen Access

Comparison of Liquid Chromatography- and Nano-Electrospray Ionization-Mass Spectrometry Approaches for Single-Cell Metabolomics

View Full Paper
ACAbigail CookCDClaire DavisonJPJordan Pascoe

Key Points

  • This research aims to compare the effectiveness of liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry and nano-electrospray ionization-mass spectrometry for single-cell metabolomics in macrophages.
  • Developed two semi-targeted metabolomics methods: direct nano-ESI-MS and LC-MS.
  • Isolated single THP-1 macrophages infected with fluorescent Mycobacterium bovis.
  • Measured amino acids and hydrophilic metabolites using both technologies.
  • LC-MS demonstrated superior metabolite coverage compared to nano-ESI-MS.
  • LC-MS provided clearer distinctions between infected and control cells.
  • Detected significant enrichment of compounds like methionine and cysteine in infected cells.

Abstract

Live single-cell metabolomics is a rapidly growing area of research, which offers the potential to provide unique insights into cellular function and heterogeneity. Single-cell isolation approaches based on capillary sampling are in principle compatible with either nano-electrospray ionization-mass spectrometry (nano-ESI-MS), where the cell is lysed and sprayed directly into a mass spectrometer, or liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) for metabolomics analysis. However, there are no data indicating which approach can provide the best performance (metabolite coverage, reproducibility and sensitivity) for single-cell metabolomics. In this work, we have developed and then compared two semitargeted metabolomics methods (direct nano-ESI-MS and LC-MS) for detecting amino acids and other hydrophilic metabolites in single macrophages. Interestingly, our results show that, even when using analytical-flow LC-MS, the coverage of metabolites is superior to the nano-ESI-MS method. We applied both methodologies to single THP-1 macrophages infected with fluorescent Mycobacterium bovis bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG), the vaccine strain of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Infected cells were identified under a microscope and sampled into glass capillaries. Our results show that the LC-MS approach provides a much clearer distinction between infected and control cells than using nano-ESI-MS. LC-MS detected enrichment of several compounds in infected cells, including methionine, cysteine and taurine, highlighting reprogramming of sulfur metabolism during mycobacterial infection. These findings establish a robust analytical framework for spatially resolved single-cell metabolomics and underscore its potential for uncovering infection-driven metabolic heterogeneity, with broad applications in infectious disease research, drug discovery, and clinical diagnostics.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Cook et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69be37dd6e48c4981c677d76https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.5c06318
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper