Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This review analyzes passive icephobic surfaces' performance in reducing ice accretion, suggesting improvements for durability and functionality.
Ice accretion on aircraft, wind-turbine blades, power networks, civil infrastructure, and exposed sensors poses severe safety risks and economic costs. Passive icephobic surfaces mitigate icing by delaying heterogeneous nucleation, altering droplet impact/solidification and wetting transitions, and/or weakening the ice–substrate bond so that accreted ice sheds under modest aerodynamic, gravitational, or vibrational loads. This review synthesizes recent progress using a unified mechanism framework linking (i) nucleation and early freezing, (ii) droplet dynamics during impact or condensation/frosting, and (iii) ice accretion and removal governed by interfacial fracture. Smooth low-surface-energy coatings, textured (superhydrophobic) surfaces, slippery liquid-infused porous surfaces (SLIPS), and low-interfacial-toughness strategies are critically compared in terms of achievable performance ranges, failure modes, durability limits, fabrication scalability, and test-method dependence. Ice-adhesion measurement approaches (push-off, pull-off/tensile, centrifugal) are assessed and a minimum reporting checklist is provided to improve comparability. Case studies across aviation, wind energy, power infrastructure, sensors, and emerging civil-engineering coatings highlight that durability and scale-dependent failure modes remain the dominant barriers to durable, energy-free icing mitigation. The review concludes with priorities for eco-friendly chemistries, self-healing or renewable layers, standardized testing/reporting, and data-driven (machine learning-assisted) optimization to accelerate translation into durable passive ice-mitigation technologies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hassani et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: