A Simulation and TOPSIS Approach to the Satellite Constellation Design Problem

The design of satellite constellations is a complex optimization problem interdependent with other decision problems and multiple competing, user-specific criteria. Consequently, it is very difficult to make a final decision on the constellation design. This study proposes a full simulation and evaluation framework for designing a satellite constellation. Firstly, constructing a solution space by constraining orbital parameters and varying satellite count and plane configuration. Secondly, employing six evaluation metrics—covering both cost and coverage—that are weighted via the case company, Sternula’s setting, with the TOPSIS approach for ranking the candidate constellations. A subsequent sensitivity analysis evaluates robustness to shifts in criterion weights and per-satellite cost. The study indicates that a Walker Star constellation with 97.5° inclination, 105 satellites in 15 planes (phasing 7) achieves the best cost–coverage balance for the case company and remains stable under weight and cost variations.