Exploration assesses heat extraction in high-temperature geothermal fields, indicating optimal conditions for sustainable use.
Well spacing and reinjection rate are two critical parameters controlling the efficiency and sustainability of hot dry rock geothermal development. Taking the Yangbajing geothermal field in Tibet as the geological setting, permeability experiments were conducted on fractured rock masses under multiple operating conditions, and a three-dimensional fully coupled thermo-hydro-mechanical numerical model was established to systematically evaluate the effects of different well spacing–reinjection rate combinations on heat extraction performance. The experimental results show that axial stress is the dominant factor governing specimen deformation and seepage characteristics. Permeability decreases with increasing axial stress, exhibiting an initial sharp decline followed by a gradual reduction. The effect of temperature varies with axial stress level. Under low to moderate axial stress, permeability decreases monotonically with increasing temperature, whereas under high axial stress, it first decreases and then increases. The simulation results indicate that the production temperature remains relatively stable during the early stage of exploitation and subsequently declines, with the rate of decline increasing significantly as the reinjection rate increases or the well spacing decreases. In addition, an exponential positive relationship is identified between well spacing and the optimal reinjection rate. When a 10% decline in production temperature is adopted as the shutdown criterion, the optimal reinjection rate increases from 60 m3/h to 150 m3/h as the well spacing increases from 500 m to 800 m. Based on the simulation results, the theoretical installed capacity of the first deep reservoir in the Yangbajing geothermal field is preliminarily estimated to reach 31.8 MW.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tian et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: