Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Investigates tidal effects on chlorophyll a variability in marine environments, indicating significant impacts on nutrient mixing.
This study investigates the influence of tides on chlorophyll a (CHL) variability in the Brazilian Equatorial Margin using daily GlobColour and MODIS-Aqua CHL data from 2005 to 2021. The impact of the tides is assessed by comparing the spring with the neap tide signals (fortnightly signal, 14.7 d). Results show that, on the shallow Amazon shelf, significant fortnightly CHL variability is likely primarily driven by barotropic tide-induced friction on the shelf that produces significant vertical mixing. On the northwestern shelf, where the Amazon River plume prevails, CHL levels are higher during neap tides, resulting in a negative spring–neap tide CHL difference (GlobColour: −50 %; MODIS-Aqua: −84 %). Conversely, on the northeastern shelf, characterized by low-turbidity waters, CHL levels are higher during spring tides, leading to a positive spring–neap tide CHL difference (GlobColour: +30 %; MODIS-Aqua: +70 %). Offshore, baroclinic tides, also known as internal tides (ITs), seem to enhance the CHL along their pathways with a spatial structure of a wave-like pattern. The positive CHL peaks are spaced by mode-2 wavelengths (about 68 km), with peak values reaching +3.3 % (GlobColour) and +9.0 % (MODIS-Aqua). Analysis shows that the CHL wave-like pattern suggests contributions from mode-1 and mode-2 internal tides, with mode-2 components having higher spectral coherence with the original signal. A 1–3 d lag between higher CHL variability and tidal potential may indicate delayed nutrient mixing post-spring–neap tides. The effects of ITs on CHL are more pronounced than on sea surface temperature.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Macedo et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: