Demonstrates the effect of span-depth ratios on fracture properties in rubberized concrete, suggesting important engineering applications.
• The fracture mode is primarily Mode I. • The fracture parameters with different β values are calculated. • The allowable damage scale decreases as the β increases. • An increase in the β reduces the brittleness of rubberized concrete. Rubberized concrete exhibits excellent resistance to abrasion and provides a value-added method for recycling waste tires, thus demonstrating significant application potential in hydraulic engineering. To systematically study its fracture performance, this study used three-point bending beam specimens with span-depth ratios of 2.5, 3, 3.5, and 4 to characterize the fracture behavior of rubber concrete. The digital image correlation method was used to obtain full-field strain and displacement data on the specimen surfaces, enabling the observation of crack propagation paths. Subsequently, the fracture parameters of rubberized concrete beams with different span-depth ratios were calculated. The relationship between initial fracture toughness and span-depth ratio was established. The results indicate that the predominant fracture mode of rubberized concrete is Mode I fracture. The fracture performance of rubberized concrete is significantly affected by the span-depth ratio. As the span-depth ratio increases, the permissible damage scale decreases, the initial fracture toughness increases gradually, while the unstable fracture toughness decreases and gradually approaches a stable value. Furthermore, the ductility index increases significantly, indicating that an increase in the span-depth ratio effectively reduces the brittleness of rubberized concrete and enhances its toughness. These findings provide theoretical support and experimental evidence for the application of rubberized concrete in hydraulic engineering.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: