Systematic review assesses long-term stability of patient-specific implants in orthognathic surgery, indicating reliable fixation methods.
This systematic review aimed to evaluate the long-term stability of patient-specific implants (PSIs) in orthognathic surgery. The review was conducted based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. A systematic search including an electronic search of numerous databases with keywords, manual and reference searches was performed. The search results were evaluated and underwent 2 rounds of elimination, first by title and abstract and second by fulfilling the 6 predetermined criteria. The included studies underwent the final systematic review. Six studies with a total of 171 subjects were included in the final review. The long-term stability of the use of PSIs in orthognathic surgery ranged from 0.27 mm to 0.5 mm for the x-axis and 0.3 mm to 1.07 mm for the y-axis. The mean change was 0.1°, 0.5° and 0.2° for the pitch, roll and yaw, respectively. The absolute mean difference of the SNA angle was 0.57°. The mean duration of operation for using PSIs was shorter than the use of conventional miniplates in orthognathic surgery by 15.7%. Complications and reoperation rates when using PSIs in orthognathic surgery were reported to be 0 in 3 studies and not reported in the other 3 studies. The results of this systematic review indicate that PSIs demonstrate clinically acceptable stability over the medium-to-long term and represent a reliable method of fixation in orthognathic surgery. Additional high-quality studies with standardised methodology and longer follow-up period of more than 24 months are recommended. This systematic review highlights the high level of long-term stability when using PSIs in orthognathic surgery in terms of bodily movements, complications and reoperation rates. Oral and maxillofacial surgeons and biomechanical engineers may now have a more comprehensive and deeper understanding of the use of PSIs in the long term, which can assist them in choosing the method of fixation in orthognathic surgery.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: