PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 21, 2026Remote Sensing3 citationsOpen Access

A Block-Wise ICP Method for Retrieving 3D Landslide Displacement Vectors Based on Terrestrial Laser Scanning Point Clouds

View Full Paper
ZXZhao XianJZJia-wen ZhouZLZhi-Yu Li

Key Points

  • The aim is to develop a block-wise ICP method for accurately retrieving 3D displacement vectors from terrestrial laser scanning data.
  • Partition the scene into local sub-blocks for focused analysis.
  • Perform rigid registration within each sub-block to estimate translations.
  • Implement a two-stage matching and quality control procedure to filter out poorly constrained sub-blocks.
  • Apply the method to the Longxigou landslide with multiple surveys over time.
  • The block-wise ICP method yields a more continuous displacement field compared to M3C2.
  • Manual measurements show displacements of 0.41–0.63 m, with the method estimate between 0.33–0.40 m.
  • In seasonal vegetation change scenes, a canopy envelope expansion of approximately 0.20–0.40 m was detected, contrasting with M3C2 difficulties in boundary interpretation.

Abstract

Terrestrial laser scanning (TLS) provides dense point clouds for landslide monitoring, yet occlusion, heterogeneous point density, and seasonal vegetation introduce noise and unstable deformation boundaries in multi-temporal change detection. To overcome the limitations of the multiscale model-to-model cloud comparison (M3C2) method under dominant downslope tangential motion and vegetation disturbance, we propose a block-wise ICP method to retrieve 3D displacement vectors. The scene is partitioned into local sub-blocks; rigid registration is performed within each sub-block, and the estimated translation is assigned to the sub-block center. A two-stage matching and quality control procedure removes under-constrained sub-blocks, enabling the direct retrieval of 3D displacement vectors and interpretable boundaries. Applied to the Longxigou landslide in Wenchuan using RIEGL VZ-2000i surveys on 1 November 2023 and 23 May 2024, the proposed method produces a more continuous displacement field and clearer boundaries than M3C2. For a tower target, manual measurements indicate a displacement of 0.41–0.63 m; our estimates are within 0.33–0.40 m, whereas M3C2 mostly falls between −0.25 and 0.25 m. In a seasonal vegetation change scene, we detect a canopy envelope expansion of approximately 0.20–0.40 m, while M3C2 shows scattered canopy responses that hinder boundary interpretation. A sensitivity analysis indicates a block-scale trade-off between boundary stability and peak preservation, motivating adaptive multi-scale blocking and uncertainty quantification.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Xian et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69be38356e48c4981c678784https://doi.org/10.3390/rs18060923
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper