PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 21, 2026Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics2 citationsOpen Access

Dual-Prep registry: Atherectomy devices and intravascUlAr lithotripsy for the PREParation of heavily calcified coronary lesions registry, 1-year results

MNM NakamuraNKNehiro KuriyamaYTYutaka Tanaka

Key Result

Atherectomy followed by intravascular lithotripsy for severely calcified coronary lesions resulted in a low 1-year major adverse cardiovascular event rate of 7.6%.

Key Points

  • To assess the safety and efficacy of combined atherectomy and intravascular lithotripsy for severely calcified coronary lesions.
  • Multicenter, prospective registry study
  • Enrolled patients undergoing atherectomy followed by intravenous lithotripsy
  • Adjudication of adverse events by a clinical events committee
  • Kaplan–Meier analysis for major adverse cardiovascular events at 1 year
  • MACE occurred in 7.6% of patients at one year
  • Cardiac death rate was 2.5%
  • Myocardial infarction and target vessel revascularization rates were both 5.1%
  • Stent thrombosis observed in 1 case
  • High follow-up completion rate of 99.2%

Study Design

Type

Observational (n=118)

Blinding

Open-label

Multicenter

Yes

Structured PICO

Does atherectomy followed by intravascular lithotripsy improve 1-year MACE in patients with severely calcified coronary lesions?

P
Population
Adults with severely calcified coronary lesions requiring percutaneous coronary intervention, mean age 75.8 years, 70.3% male, 56.8% with diabetes mellitus.
I
Intervention
Atherectomy (rotational or orbital) followed by intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) and drug-eluting stent (DES) deployment.
O
Outcome
Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE; composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, and target vessel revascularization [TVR]) at 1 year.composite

Combination therapy with atherectomy followed by intravascular lithotripsy for severely calcified coronary lesions is safe and effective, yielding a low 1-year MACE rate of 7.6%.

Limitations

  • Open-label, single-arm trial design lacking a comparator group
  • Selection of treatment device size and subsequent therapy was left to the treating physician's judgment without consistent rules
  • Low frequency of acute coronary syndrome cases makes efficacy in all clinical situations unclear
  • Cost-effectiveness of the combined approach remains unclear
  • Small number of events precluded multivariate analysis of event-related factors
  • Long-term prognosis beyond 1 year remains unknown
  • Open-label, single-arm trial
  • Selection of treatment device size and subsequent therapy was left to the treating physician's judgment
  • Low frequency of ACS
  • Balance of cost-effectiveness remains unclear
  • Small number of events prevented multivariate analysis of event-related factors

Abstract

Combination therapy with atherectomy and intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) has emerged as a promising strategy for the treatment of severely calcified occlusive coronary lesions, which potentially enhances procedural efficacy without increasing complication risk. The Dual-Prep Registry is a multicenter, prospective registry designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of IVL after atherectomy in severely calcified lesions. Combined use was selectively applied when the risk of complications was anticipated to be high with a larger atherectomy burr size, or when it was deemed non-beneficial due to unfavorable guidewire bias. All adverse events were adjudicated by a clinical events committee. Kaplan–Meier analysis was performed to evaluate the primary endpoint of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE; composite endpoint of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, and target vessel revascularization TVR) at 1 year. A total of 118 cases (120 lesions) were enrolled across 20 facilities. Significant comorbidities included diabetes in 56.8% of patients and hemodialysis-dependence in 25.4%. Calcification score after atherectomy was 4.0 in all cases, and calcified nodules were present in 41.7% (core-lab analysis) of cases. One-year follow-up was complete in 99.2% patients. MACE occurred in 7.6% patients at one year (cardiac death 2.5%, myocardial infarction 5.1%, TVR 5.1%) and stent thrombosis was observed in 1 case. Atherectomy followed by IVL resulted in low 1-year rates of MACE, TVR, and stent thrombosis in patients with severely calcified coronary lesions. This approach may be considered for lesions where an “IVL-first” strategy is difficult to apply. Japan Registry of Clinical Trials: jRCT1032230384. URL: https://jrct.mhlw.go.jp .

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Nakamura et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Severely calcified coronary lesions (n=118). Atherectomy followed by intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) was evaluated on 1-year Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events (MACE: composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, and target vessel revascularization). Atherectomy followed by intravascular lithotripsy for severely calcified coronary lesions resulted in a low 1-year major adverse cardiovascular event rate of 7.6%.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69be38446e48c4981c67896dhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s12928-026-01264-4
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper