Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Retrospective cohort study evaluates single-port surgery benefits in ovarian cyst treatment, suggesting improved outcomes.
Objective This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and patient-centered outcomes of single-port laparoscopic surgery (LESS) versus traditional multi-port laparoscopic surgery for benign ovarian cysts. Methods A retrospective cohort study enrolled 260 patients (January 2022–September 2025) divided into single-port group ( n = 130, transumbilical LESS) and multi-port group ( n = 130, conventional laparoscopy). Outcomes included perioperative indicators (operative duration, blood loss, time to first flatus/ambulation, hospital stay, 24-hour Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) pain), postoperative day-1 inflammatory markers (C-reactive protein (CRP), IL-6, procalcitonin), preoperative/1-3 month postoperative anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH) (ovarian reserve), hospitalization costs, and abdominal wall appearance satisfaction (POSAS). Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to reduce bias. Results After PSM, the single-port group had lower 24-hour VAS scores (2.36 ± 0.86 vs. 3.72 ± 1.30, P < 0.001), higher abdominal wall satisfaction (97.7% vs. 71.5%, OR = 16.8, P < 0.001), shorter time to first flatus (15.1 ± 2.9 vs. 21.1 ± 4.1 h), ambulation (13.6 ± 2.4 vs. 20.9 ± 3.2 h), and hospital stay (3.99 ± 0.60 vs. 5.33 ± 1.50 d, all P < 0.001). It also had lower costs (17,130 ± 3,793 vs. 19,036 ± 4,403 yuan) and inflammatory markers (all P < 0.001), and less postoperative shoulder pain (23.8% vs. 28.5%, OR = 8.03, P < 0.001). Operative duration, blood loss, and 1-3 month AMH showed no inter-group differences (all P > 0.05). No conversions, 30-day readmissions, or complication rate differences were observed ( P > 0.999). Conclusion LESS for benign ovarian cysts has comparable safety/efficacy to multi-port laparoscopy, with advantages of less pain, milder inflammation, faster recovery, lower costs, and better cosmetic satisfaction, while preserving ovarian reserve—making it a valuable minimally invasive option.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Xia et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: