PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 21, 2026Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery Global Open2 citationsOpen Access

Jet Cold Plasma at Atmospheric Air Pressure for Venous Ulcers: A Randomized Clinical Trial

View Full Paper
AHA. HenaresSVSonia VillajosATAntonio Tejera

Key Points

  • This trial investigates the efficacy and safety of cold atmospheric plasma jet therapy for chronic venous leg ulcers compared to standard care.
  • Randomized, controlled, open-label trial
  • Sixty adult patients with nonhealing VLUs
  • CAPJ therapy administered twice weekly for 10 weeks
  • Primary outcome: percentage reduction in wound area
  • Secondary outcomes: pain, aesthetic satisfaction, microbial burden, adverse events
  • CAPJ group showed a mean wound area reduction of –72.9% at week 17
  • SOC group displayed a reduction of –56.7% at week 17
  • Complete healing in 42.9% of CAPJ patients versus 30.4% in SOC
  • Significant decrease in microbial burden observed at weeks 0 and 4
  • Both groups had similar pain score improvements with high aesthetic satisfaction

Abstract

Background: This prospective, randomized, controlled, open-label, multicenter clinical trial evaluated the efficacy and safety of air-based cold atmospheric plasma jet (CAPJ) therapy for chronic venous leg ulcers (VLUs) compared with standard of care (SOC). Methods: Sixty adult patients with nonhealing VLUs were randomized to receive either CAPJ therapy twice weekly for 10 weeks or SOC. The primary outcome was the percentage reduction in wound area at weeks 4, 9, and 17. Secondary outcomes included granulation tissue formation, microbial burden (qualitative and quantitative), pain (visual analog scale), aesthetic satisfaction, and adverse events. Analyses were performed on an intention-to-treat basis. Results: Both groups demonstrated progressive reductions in wound area over time. Although the CAPJ group exhibited a greater mean reduction (–72.9% versus –56.7% at week 17), the difference was not statistically significant ( P = 0.30). Complete healing was achieved in 42.9% of CAPJ patients compared with 30.4% in the SOC group ( P = 0.361). CAPJ produced significant immediate decreases in microbial burden at weeks 0 and 4 ( P < 0.05). Pain scores improved similarly in both groups, and aesthetic satisfaction was high without significant intergroup differences. No serious adverse events were attributed to the device; transient pain-related sensations were the most frequent treatment-related effects. Conclusions: Although not statistically superior to SOC, air CAPJ therapy resulted in clinically meaningful wound area reduction, rapid antimicrobial effects, and high patient acceptability without increased adverse events. These findings support further investigation of CAPJ as a safe, noninvasive therapy for chronic VLU management.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Henares et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69be38596e48c4981c678bd2https://doi.org/10.1097/gox.0000000000007553
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper