Study evaluates the effects of different pollen types on honey bee health, suggesting multiple dietary stressors influence outcomes.
The western honey bee ( Apis mellifera L.) is increasingly affected by chronic dietary exposure to pesticide-contaminated pollen. This study investigates the long-term effects of Malus domestica , Phacelia tanacetifolia , and Taraxacum sp. pollen collected from orchard and alpine habitats alongside a commercial feed additive (Promotor-L Apis) on honey bee survival, physiology, and gut microbiota. Multiresidue analysis revealed distinct pesticide and heavy metal profiles across pollens, while compositional analyses showed variation in amino acids, flavonoids, and phenolamides. Despite high contamination, Malus pollen with elevated flavonoid content promoted the highest vitellogenin accumulation and did not totally inhibit survival. Phacelia pollen from organic vineyards, though low in pesticides, had high copper levels and showed high mortality. Taraxacum pollen from apple orchards, though moderately contaminated, supported high survival. Unexpectedly, alpine Taraxacum pollen with elevated histidine content caused the highest mortality and microbial disruption, despite no pesticide residues. Promotor-L improved survival but did not increase vitellogenin. Pollen-fed bees generally exhibited higher gut microbiota abundance, while pathogen levels (including Nosema ceranae and Serratia marcescens ) were specifically elevated under Taraxacum -based diets. These findings highlight that the impact of pollen nutrition on bee health is multifactorial, governed not only by pesticide exposure but also by botanical origin, nutritional traits, and secondary metabolites. • Poor-quality monofloral pollen diets can be as detrimental as pesticide exposure. • Botanical origin strongly modulated pollen-associated risks to honey bees. • Bee health and survival outcomes reflected multiple interacting dietary stressors.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Janam et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: