This essay theorizes the impact of digital political voyeurism on polarization in Indonesia, suggesting broader implications for decentralized democracies.
This essay theorizes decentralization’s “double movement”—the simultaneous potential to accommodate pluralism and provoke polarization in a digital information environment. Indonesia serves as the empirical focus: Nationwide protests over Jakarta governor Basuki “Ahok” Tjahaja Purnama’s 2017 blasphemy case, largely driven by citizens from outside his jurisdiction, exemplify how forms of digital-era political voyeurism amplify local conflicts. New survey evidence further links political voyeurism to heightened polarization and illiberal attitudes. The findings underscore a broader paradox for decentralized democracies worldwide, highlighting how digital connectivity can transform local diversity into fuel for national polarization.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nicholas Kuipers (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: