To elucidate the underlying mechanism of organizational members’ engagement in open innovation, this study draws on the theory of motivated information management and analyzes survey data of 1200 full-timers in Japan. Structural equation modeling and multi-group structural equation modeling analyses have revealed that employees tasked with open-innovation initiatives rely more heavily on self-efficacy beliefs (β = 0.69, p < .001) than cost–benefit calculations (β = 0.08, p = .10) to determine their actions. These tendencies are further amplified by the employees’ individual-level corporate entrepreneurship (βs = 0.44–0.47, p < .001), whereas the impact of organizational support remains comparatively limited (β = 0.0.08–0.40, p < .01–.001). These results are consistent with the theory of motivated information management, which posits that individuals in high-uncertainty contexts prioritize efficacy over cost–benefit calculations—thereby they demonstrate the theory uniquely explains and predicts human-level dynamics of open innovation. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed along with the limitations and future directions.
Matsunaga et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: