Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Research reveals that inhibiting p300/CREBBP boosts transcription in AML, suggesting new therapeutic strategies.
The lysine acetyltransferase (KAT) activity of p300/CREBBP has traditionally been linked to transcriptional activation. This has been attributed largely to acetylation of histone residues such as H3K27ac, a defining hallmark of active regulatory elements. Here we show that, in acute myeloid leukemia (AML), inhibition of p300/CREBBP catalysis can paradoxically increase transcription. We combined time-resolved dynamics of nascent and total transcription with chromatin binding dynamics of p300/CREBBP and their associated TFs/co-regulators (inferred from chromatin pull-down proteomics, acetyl-proteomics and motif enrichment) to uncover mechanisms of transcriptional rewiring after p300/CREBBP catalytic inhibition. In parallel, we dissected the functional contribution of individual p300/CREBBP acetyl-interactome members to KAT inhibition using genome-wide CRISPR-Cas9 dropout and focused Perturb-seq screens. Together, these approaches revealed that KAT inhibition paradoxically retains p300/CREBBP and promotes cooperative TF assembly and increased H3K27 acetylation at a subset of regulatory elements. The effect was most pronounced at IRF motif-enriched loci, including interferon-stimulated genes (ISGs), where KAT inhibition triggered p300/CREBBP accumulation and enhanced combinatorial TF binding, enabling recruitment of the ISG activator STAT1. Consequently, ISG loci were converted into transcriptionally active states that induced cell-cycle arrest, differentiation and apoptosis. Therapeutically, combining KAT inhibition with interferon-alpha augmented ISG expression, synergistically drove AML cell death in vitro and significantly extended survival in both AML xenografts and murine models. These findings refine our understanding of p300/CREBBP KAT activity, demonstrating that cooperative TF assembly can reconfigure p300/CREBBP-containing complexes under catalytic inhibition to induce transcription, with translational implications for reprogramming interferon-driven programs through catalytic inhibition in AML and beyond.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Meyerhöfer et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: