PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 21, 2026Computers, materials & continua/Computers, materials & continua (Print)2 citationsOpen Access

Industrial-Oriented Applications of Sparrow Search Algorithm in Machine Learning Optimization: A Review of Emerging Trends

LWLinhui WangMHMohd Khair HassanGAGhulam E Mustafa Abro

Key Points

  • The review aims to align the Sparrow Search Algorithm with industrial optimization needs and challenges.
  • Developed an industrial taxonomy for SSA applications
  • Compiled a benchmark evidence base for evaluation
  • Created a variant-selection matrix for different industrial tasks
  • Provided practical guidance on deploying SSA in resource-constrained environments
  • Analyzed SSA performance against classical optimizers
  • Identified conditions under which SSA outperforms classical optimization methods
  • Highlighted scalability and real-time feasibility challenges of SSA applications
  • Outlined practical issues like robustness, explainability, and latency in industrial settings

Abstract

Industrial intelligent systems increasingly require efficient, robust, and deployable optimization methods for resource-constrained hardware. The Sparrow Search Algorithm (SSA) has gained traction in machine learning optimization; however, existing reviews emphasize algorithmic variants and generic benchmarks while paying limited attention to industrial requirements such as real-time operation, noise tolerance, and hardware awareness. This review advances the field by developing an industrial taxonomy that aligns SSA and its hybrids with six application clusters—fault diagnosis, production scheduling, edge-intelligent control, renewable/microgrid optimization, battery prognostics, and industrial cybersecurity—characterizing task types, data regimes, latency and safety constraints, and typical failure modes; by consolidating a benchmark evidence base that compiles representative datasets, metrics, compute budgets, baseline line-ups (PSO/GA/DE/GWO), and anytime behavior (time-to-target, AUC-anytime) for fair, reproducible comparison; and by distilling practitioner-oriented guidance that includes a variant-selection matrix (e.g., quantum/DE hybrids for high-dimensional tuning, chaotic/Lévy SSA for noisy multimodal landscapes, multi-objective SSA for trade-off-intensive scheduling), robust default hyper-ranges, and a deployment checklist covering robustness tests, calibration and explainability, and latency/energy reporting under edge constraints. Comparative evidence across non-convex, high-dimensional, and noise-aware tasks identifies conditions under which SSA and its hybrids surpass classical optimizers, alongside analyses of scalability and real-time feasibility, and articulates the remaining challenges and research directions to support rigorous benchmarking and trustworthy industrial deployment.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Wang et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69be38b56e48c4981c6794efhttps://doi.org/10.32604/cmc.2026.074207
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper