PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 21, 2026Sustainability2 citationsOpen Access

Institutional and Financial Drivers of Renewable Energy Consumption and Carbon Emissions: Evidence from Developed Economies

View Full Paper
EOEnes Cengiz OguzEGEvans Akwasi GyasiFPFahrettin Pala

Key Points

  • The research aims to explore the interplay between financial development, FDI, and regulatory frameworks on renewable energy consumption and carbon emissions.
  • Analyzed data from 22 developed countries between 2002 and 2021
  • Examined the influence of financial development and FDI on renewable energy and emissions
  • Investigated the role of regulatory quality as a moderator in these relationships
  • Financial development and FDI reduce reliance on renewable energy
  • Higher GDP per capita leads to increased reliance on renewable energy
  • Carbon emissions negatively correlate with renewable energy adoption and financial development
  • Stronger regulatory frameworks can enhance the positive impact of FDI on emissions reductions

Abstract

The study sheds light on the subtle interactions among financial development, foreign direct investment (FDI), and the quality of regulatory frameworks, with particular reference to their deep influence on renewable energy use and carbon emissions across 22 developed countries from 2002–2021. The results show an interesting tendency: Financial development and FDI will reduce reliance on renewable energy, whereas a significant increase in GDP per capita will increase reliance. Secondly, carbon emissions have a negative association with the adoption of renewable energy and financial development, though both reduce environmental quality; there is a positive relation between real gross domestic product (GDP) and energy depletion in terms of these toxic emissions. The significant role of regulatory quality as a moderator in this process is particularly striking. There is a direct correlation between financial stability and more robust regulation, resulting in reduced financial liquidity available for investing in renewable projects and restricting the free flow of clean FDI. Crucially, the paper argues that when combined with strong regulation, FDI is more likely to contribute to reductions in emissions, while FYGD, nevertheless regulated at a high level of quality, should raise emissions. Winding up, the result indicates that neither financial depth nor institutional quality, in isolation, is sufficient to deliver significant environmental improvement. Thus, it is urgent to adopt sound green finance policies and to formulate focused regulatory systems that integrate financial development and foreign direct investment with a broader sustainability agenda.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Oguz et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69be38da6e48c4981c679942https://doi.org/10.3390/su18063022
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper