Defines preference formation in AI-scored societies, suggesting that preferences develop through ongoing interaction.
This paper defines Preference Formation as a structural process through which pref-erences are produced through continuous interaction with an AI-mediated environment.In contrast to models that treat preference as an internally given or autonomously se-lected property, this study establishes that preferences are not chosen; they are formedunder conditions of repeated exposure.The paper identifies the observed structural conditions of preference formation,including repeated exposure, convergence of available elements, stabilization of inter-action patterns, and gradual transformation. It then formalizes Preference Formationas a dynamic and cumulative process, distinguishing it from both choice and fixedproperties, and expressing it as a time-dependent structural relation.The structural properties of Preference Formation are specified as cumulativity,convergence, asymmetric reversibility, and recursivity. These properties demonstratethat preference is progressively stabilized through repeated interaction while remainingpath-dependent and continuously reconfigurable.The paper further establishes the structural relationship between Preference For-mation and Algorithmic Selection. While selection defines the conditions of exposure,preference formation determines how exposure becomes internally structured into rel-atively durable orientation. This interaction forms a recursive loop linking externalstructuring and internal formation.Finally, the implications of Preference Formation are outlined as a structural pro-gression from preference to behavior, evaluation, and score formation. This progressionpositions Preference Formation as the internal condition through which orientation be-comes behaviorally stable and externally legible within AI-mediated environments.Accordingly, Preference Formation is defined as a fundamental internal mechanismwithin AI-Scored Societies, completing the structural model in which preferences arenot given, but continuously formed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kawazoe Tsutomu (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: