This analysis evaluates the structural properties necessary for persistent autonomous systems under constraints, suggesting improvements for AI reliability.
This paper analyzes the structural requirements for persistent autonomous systems under bounded conditions. Current AI systems demonstrate strong capability but lack persistence: they do not maintain identity across time, cannot guarantee decision lineage after change, and cannot independently verify consequential actions. Starting from three constraints—bounded representational capacity, the impossibility of internal self-certification, and the requirement for invariant-governed continuity—the paper derives a necessary structural ordering: identity → invariant → observable → probability. From this ordering, a phased architecture is constructed, progressing from replayable decision systems to persistent autonomous systems. Core contributions include the Drift Lemma, which limits internal certainty in bounded systems, and a framework for external verification through replayable artifacts. The paper does not claim that existing systems satisfy these conditions. Instead, it establishes necessary structural properties for autonomy under constraint, providing a framework for evaluating and designing systems that persist as the same lawful subject across time.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Devin Bostick (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: