PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 22, 2026JAMA Network Open2 citationsOpen Access

FDA-Regulated AI-Enabled Medical Devices With Pediatric Indications

View Full Paper
GZGrzegorz ZapotocznyAGAnsh GoyalMCM Christmas

Key Points

  • This research examines the development and regulation of pediatric medical devices and their differences from nonpediatric devices.
  • Analyzed approval times for pediatric versus nonpediatric medical devices
  • Assessed the percentage of devices requiring clinical trials
  • Evaluated standards for age labeling and validation of AI technologies
  • Pediatric devices are less common than nonpediatric counterparts
  • Pediatric devices face longer review periods
  • There is a higher proportion of registered clinical trials for pediatric devices

Abstract

In this study, pediatric devices were rare, emerged recently, and had longer review times and a higher proportion of registered clinical trials compared with nonpediatric devices, suggesting expectations for more pediatric-specific evidence despite unchanged statutory standards. To address gaps in pediatric device development, the FDA should standardize age labeling and validation requirements for AI-enabled technologies.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Zapotoczny et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69bf38f3c7b3c90b18b42c7ahttps://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2026.2636
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper