PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 22, 20260 citationsOpen Access

A Survey of Patients' Experience With a Dual Orthodontic Retention Protocol

View Full Paper
FTFEYZANUR TETIKOkan UniversityAEAybüke EnsarioğluOkan UniversityADARZU ARI DEMIRKAYA

Key Points

  • This study evaluates the effectiveness of a dual orthodontic retention protocol and how patient knowledge influences compliance.
  • Conducted an online survey targeting patients who completed orthodontic treatment with a dual retention protocol.
  • Analyzed data from 278 participants focusing on retainer use and breakage rates.
  • Employed statistical analyses, including Chi-square tests and Fisher–Freeman–Halton exact tests.
  • Knowledge about removable retainers significantly linked to their frequency of use.
  • 76% of uninformed participants did not use their retainers regularly versus only 29.8% of informed participants.
  • Removable retainer use decreased dramatically from 50% in the first year to 4.3% after three years.

Abstract

Abstract Aim: The success of retention protocols in preventing orthodontic relapse depends not only on the effectiveness of the appliances used but also on patient compliance. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of dual retention protocol, which combines fixed retainers and removable retainers to be use only 15 minutes a week. Using a survey method, the long-term stability of the fixed retainer and the time-dependent changes in removable appliance use were examined. Additionally, patients’ knowledge of the protocol and their adherence were assessed. Materials and Methods: Patients who had completed active orthodontic treatment and were managed with a dual retention protocol were identified and invited to participate in an online survey. Data from 278 participants were analyzed, focusing on the frequency and duration of removable retainer use, breakage rates of fixed retainers, and patients’ knowledge regarding the retention protocol. Statistical analyses were performed using IBM SPSS Statistics version 22; descriptive statistics were calculated, and categorical variables were analyzed using the Chi-square and Fisher–Freeman–Halton exact tests, with significance set at p < 0.05. Results: Knowledge of the purpose of removable retainers was significantly associated with frequency of use. While 76% of participants lacking knowledge of the retainer’s purpose reported non-use, this proportion was only 29.8% among informed participants. Removable retainer use declined over time; approximately 50% reported regular use in the first year, compared with only 4.3% after the third year. Fixed retainer breakage rates also increased over time, reaching 59.7% among the patients who had completed treatment 2–4 years earlier. Conclusion: The findings indicate that reduced motivation and insufficient patient knowledge may compromise adherence to the retention protocol. While the dual retention protocol offers a theoretically effective retention strategy, its long-term success is closely linked to patient education and sustained motivation. Surveys based on patient experience contribute to improving and personalizing retention strategies.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

TETIK et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69bf38f3c7b3c90b18b42fa6https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19123669
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper