PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 22, 2026Medicine0 citationsOpen Access

The influence of the positional relationship between the pedicle and the pars interarticularis on unilateral biportal endoscopy: A retrospective cohort study

View Full Paper
SSShuhua ShenTLTingyuan LaiHWHao Wei

Key Points

  • The research investigates how the positional relationship between the pars interarticularis and pedicle affects outcomes in lumbar spinal stenosis patients undergoing unilateral biportal endoscopy.
  • Retrospective cohort study of lumbar spinal stenosis patients receiving unilateral biportal endoscopy (UBE) between January 2020 and December 2024.
  • Patients grouped by distance from lateral margin of pars interarticularis to medial margin of pedicle (DLM).
  • Evaluated preoperative imaging parameters (LAA, LW, FJA), surgical indicators, and clinical outcomes (VAS, Oswestry Disability Index).
  • Statistical analyses conducted using SPSS 26.0 with ANOVA, χ2 test, and Spearman correlation.
  • Smaller DLM linked to lower Oswestry Disability Index scores postoperatively and longer hospital stays.
  • Higher rates of facet joint injury seen in patients with smaller DLM during surgery.
  • No significant differences observed in dural sac area improvement or leg VAS among groups.

Abstract

This study aims to investigate the positional relationship between the pars interarticularis and the pedicle in lumbar spinal stenosis patients and clarify its guiding significance for individualized decompression strategies in unilateral biportal endoscopy (UBE). All patients received standardized UBE. DLM, laminar abduction angle LAA, laminar width (LW), and facet joint angle (FJA) differed significantly among groups (all P .05). DLM is closely associated with UBE clinical outcomes and an important anatomical reference. Smaller DLM may increase intraoperative facet joint injury risk, potentially due to compact spinal anatomy, which may worsen postoperative recovery. Preoperative DLM evaluation may help identify high-risk patients and guide individualized strategies, balancing decompression efficacy and spinal stability. A retrospective cohort study included patients with L3-S1 lumbar spinal stenosis who underwent UBE decompression between January 2020 and December 2024. Inclusion criteria: confirmed imaging diagnosis, typical symptoms consistent with imaging, ineffective conservative treatment for ≥3 months, limited surgical segments, complete clinical/imaging data, follow-up ≥3 months. Exclusion criteria: lumbar spondylolisthesis (Meyerding grade ≥ II), prior same-segment spinal surgery, pathological stenosis, severe systemic/mental illnesses, blurred imaging data. Patients were grouped by the distance from the lateral margin of pars interarticularis to medial margin of pedicle (DLM). Evaluated indicators: preoperative imaging parameters (LAA, LW, FJA), surgical indicators, clinical outcomes (preoperative/postoperative VAS, preoperative/3-month postoperative Oswestry Disability Index, 3-month postoperative Macnab score), and postoperative imaging parameters (inferior articular process reserved amount, destruction grade, dural sac area). Statistical analyses used SPSS 26.0: ANOVA/Kruskal-Wallis H test, χ 2 test/Fisher’s exact test, Spearman correlation, Jonckheere–Terpstra test, and ICC for consistency; P < .05 was significant.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Shen et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69bf3955c7b3c90b18b43dbahttps://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000047945
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper