PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 22, 2026International Journal of Infectious Diseases2 citationsOpen Access

Coverage, Effectiveness and Sero-positivity of Measles-Containing Vaccines in Low- and Lower Middle-Income Countries: An Umbrella Review of Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses

YMYahaya MohammedDODr Ahmed Olowo-okereSBSamuel Bawa

Key Points

  • This research aims to synthesize trends in measles vaccine coverage and its effectiveness in low- and lower middle-income countries.
  • Conducted an umbrella review of systematic reviews from 2010 to 2025
  • Analyzed WHO/UNICEF data for 79 low- and lower middle-income countries
  • Utilized meta-meta-analysis to synthesize determinants of vaccine uptake
  • Mean MCV1 coverage was 79.2% in 2024; only 21.5% of countries reached the 95% elimination threshold
  • MCV2 coverage averaged 69.4%, with a dropout gap of 10.9 percentage points
  • Positive maternal perception and awareness of vaccine benefits were identified as key predictors for vaccine uptake

Abstract

Background: Despite global investments, achieving measles elimination targets remain elusive in low-and middle-income countries (LMICs).This study provides a comprehensive synthesis of measles-containing vaccine (MCV) coverage trends, effectiveness, and uptake determinants to inform strategic realignment. Methods:We conducted an umbrella review of systematic reviews (2010-2025) and analyzed WHO/UNICEF coverage data for 79 LMICs.Determinants were synthesized via meta-meta-analysis.Results: Twelve reviews and longitudinal data for 79 countries were analyzed.In 2024, mean MCV1 coverage was 79.2% (SD=16.0%),with only 17 countries (21.5%) achieving the 95% elimination threshold.MCV2 coverage averaged 69.4% (SD=19.9%)and a mean dropout gap (difference between MCV1 and MCV2) of 10.9 percentage points.Regional disparities were profound: the regions of Americas and Africa recorded the lowest mean MCV1 coverage (74.3% and 76.8% respectively), while the African Region faced critical gaps in MCV2 (64.9%).Meta-meta-analysis identified positive maternal perception (Pooled OR=4.05; 95% CI: 2.89-5.66)and awareness of benefits (Pooled OR=2.99) as the strongest predictors of uptake.Conclusions: Fewer than one-quarter of LMICs currently meet measles elimination targets.The stagnation in coverage and significant dropout rates necessitate a strategic shift to prevent measles resurgence and protect vulnerable children.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Mohammed et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69bf8641f665edcd009e8cb2https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2026.108569
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Uptake of the Second Dose of the Measles Vaccine and Its Determinants Among Children Aged Less Than 5 Years: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis2025
  2. 2Progress with the Second Dose Measles Vaccine Introduction and Coverage in the WHO African Region2024 · 2 citations
  3. 3Serological Protection After Routine Measles-Containing Vaccination Among Children Aged 1–5 Years in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review2026
  4. 4Inequalities in Second-Dose Measles Vaccination Coverage Among Children Aged 24–35 Months in Ethiopia2026
  5. 5Evaluating measles control measures and the transition of surveillance strategies in tribal-dominated areas of western India2026