Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Longitudinal analysis of screening behaviors reveals significant changes after EMR implementation, suggesting improved practices.
Inappropriate cervical cancer screening practices, including over- and under-screening, pose significant healthcare burdens in low-resource settings. This study analyzed screening behaviors and determinants among 33,362 women aged 35–64 in Wuxiang County, China, using longitudinal cohort data. Screening events were classified as guideline-adherent, over-screened, under-screened, or unscreened based on prior methods (HPV, cytology, or co-testing) and results, using cause-specific frailty models for analysis. Overall, only 19.9% of events were guideline-adherent, while 29.5% were over-screened and 50.6% were under- or unscreened. Notably, the implementation of a county-wide Electronic Medical Record (EMR) platform in 2022 coincided with a sharp decline in over-screening from 36.7% to 15.7%. Compared with primary HPV testing, prior co-testing increased the hazard of both over- and under-screening, whereas prior cytology was strongly associated with under-screening. Women with low-grade abnormalities (≤CIN1) showed a substantially higher risk of under-screening compared to those with negative results. Additionally, community residents were more prone to over-screening, while village residents faced higher under-screening risks. These findings suggest that transitioning to HPV-based screening and integrating EMR systems effectively reduces unnecessary testing, though enhanced reminder systems are crucial to address persistent under-screening in resource-constrained regions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: