PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 22, 2026Advanced Engineering Informatics2 citationsOpen Access

Porosity prediction in laser beam welding with a multimodal physics-informed machine learning framework

View Full Paper
XMXiangmeng MengMBMarcel BachmannFYFan Yang

Key Points

  • The primary aim is to predict porosity defects in laser beam welding using a novel integrated framework that combines physical modeling and machine learning.
  • Developed a multimodal physics-informed machine learning (PIML) framework.
  • Utilized both experimental and simulated data for training the model.
  • Incorporated scalar welding parameters and high-dimensional physical information as inputs to the PIML model.
  • Implemented an encoder-decoder architecture for the machine learning-based estimator.
  • Achieved a 45% reduction in mean square error for porosity prediction compared to a model using only welding parameters.
  • Successfully reproduced critical physical information within seconds using the ML-based estimator.

Abstract

Laser beam welding (LBW) of metallic components is a knowledge‑intensive manufacturing process whose quality depends on the complex multi‑physics. However, its engineering application is often hindered by the occurrence of porosity defects. Achieving a thorough understanding and reliable prediction of porosity defects remains difficult because it demands robust representation and reasoning over nonlinear and hard‑to‑observe physical information. In this study, we propose an integrated multimodal physics-informed machine learning (PIML) framework with the help of multi-physical modelling and experimental data to predict the porosity defects in laser beam welding of aluminum alloys. The whole framework contains a multimodal PIML model for predicting the porosity ratio and an ML-based estimator for relevant physical information. By utilizing the scalar welding parameters and high-dimensional physical information (probability of keyhole collapses, cumulative existing time of collapses, and molten pool geometry) as inputs, the multimodal PIML model shows great superiority in predicting the porosity ratio, with a reduction of the mean square error by 45%, compared with the ML model trained only with welding parameters. The ML-based estimator constructed with an encoder‐decoder architecture can accurately reproduce the critical physical information within a timeframe of seconds. By integrating these two ML models, the proposed framework advances engineering informatics by offering a scalable, physics-knowledge‑centric solution for fast and accurate porosity prediction in LBW manufacturing.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Meng et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69bf86ecf665edcd009e9181https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2026.104611
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper