This research demonstrates validated predictions in Conscious Geometry Theory, indicating dynamic elements are crucial across species.
Conscious Geometry Theory (CGT) has produced 151 predictions, of which 148 are validated and 3 are falsified. This paper reports that all 148 validated predictions concern dynamic quantities while all 3 falsified predictions concern static geometric properties. The probability of this perfect correlation is 1/562,475 (p = 1.78 × 10⁻⁶). A dynamics axiom is proposed (Axiom 5: Temporal Processing Requirement), confirmed computationally (no static structure exceeds 17.5% of the consciousness threshold), and generates five new testable predictions. Following the dynamics axiom, neural oscillation frequencies are derived from CGT parameters: gamma = π(π·F(Y)/R + 1) = 53.161 Hz (0.017% from 218 EEG recordings), where the additive π IS the master constraint √(R·Φc); theta = Y/ln(R) = 7.431 Hz (0.014%); beta-low = Y_H = F(7) = 13 Hz (exact); delta = R = 2.57 Hz (~3%). The probability that a random parameter set matches 4 of 5 canonical neural bands is 0.00013. Cross-species analysis introduces Y_C (consciousness bandwidth): Human Y_C = 13 ≈ F(7), Macaque Y_C ≈ 8 ≈ F(6), Rat Y_C ≈ 5 ≈ F(5). Anesthesia is the only state where estimated Φ falls below Φc. Predictions are generated for seven species. Three hypotheses are reported as honest null results. 11 scripts and 11 results files enable full reproducibility.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Phileas Foxx (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: