PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 22, 2026Liver Cancer5 citationsOpen Access

Immune checkpoint inhibitor rechallenge in unresectable hepatocellularcarcinoma: a multicenter efficacy and safety study

View Full Paper
JCJing-Kun ChenJWJia-Liang WeiZYZhen‐Dong Yang

Key Points

  • This study investigates the efficacy and safety of resuming immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma after initial treatment failure.
  • Retrospective analysis of patients treated from March 2019 to May 2024 across 12 medical centers in China
  • Included patients who had previously stopped immune checkpoint inhibitors due to resistance or severe adverse events
  • Assessed event-free survival, objective response rates, and side effects during first-and second-line ICI therapies.
  • Final analysis included 272 patients with median age 50 years; 93% discontinued ICI-1 due to progression
  • Median event-free survival was 5.3 months for ICI-1 and 4.4 months for ICI-2
  • Objective response rates were 23.2% for ICI-1 and 18.4% for ICI-2
  • No deaths from immune-related adverse events were reported during the study.

Abstract

Background and aims: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are a standard treatment for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma, but sometimes they must be discontinued because of resistance or immune-related adverse events. The present study explored whether later resuming ICI therapy in such patients ("rechallenge") can improve their prognosis. Methods: Data were retrospectively analyzed for patients treated between March 2019 and May 2024 at 12 medical centers in China. Patients had unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma and were initially treated with ICIs, which were discontinued due to resistance or severe immune-related adverse events and then later resumed. Event-free survival, objective response and disease control based on RECIST 1.1 criteria, as well as incidence and severity of immune-related adverse events, were assessed separately during first- (ICI-1) and second-line ICI (ICI-2) therapy. Results: The final analysis included 272 patients (247 men) with a median age of 50 (IQR 43-58) years old at enrollment; ICI-1 were discontinued in 253 patients (93.0%) because of tumor progression. Both ICI-1 and ICI-2 therapies lasted a median of 3.0 months and, for approximately 80% of patients, involved the combination of ICIs and targeted agents rather than ICI monotherapy. During ICI-1 or ICI-2 therapy, respective median event-free survival times were 5.3 (95% CI 4.7–5.9) months and 4.4 (95% CI 3.8–5.0) months, objective response rates were 23.2% and 18.4%, disease control rates were 69.9% and 48.2%, and rates of immune-related adverse events of grades 3-4 were 18.4% and 19.9%. Objective response was observed in 26 patients (9.6%) during both therapy lines, while 10 (12.2%) suffered disease progression during ICI-1 therapy yet achieved partial response during ICI-2 treatment. No deaths due to immune-related adverse events occurred during the study. Conclusion: ICI rechallenge following tumor progression or severe immune-related adverse events can benefit some patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma without posing additional safety risks.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Chen et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69bf899af665edcd009e958ehttps://doi.org/10.1159/000551629
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper