Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Experiment reveals temperature and strain variations in the fault zone during CO2 injection, indicating enhanced carbon storage safety.
Fault activity at carbon storage sites is a critical factor governing the long-term safety of geological CO 2 sequestration. However, the mechanisms through which CO 2 injection influences fault behavior remain insufficiently understood. To address this issue, a large-scale three-dimensional physical similarity experiment was independently developed to simulate CO 2 injection into a fault zone, with real-time monitoring of strain and temperature variations in the surrounding rock throughout the injection process. The results demonstrate a robust correlation between strain and temperature responses, with the footwall formations exhibiting more significant variations than the hanging wall under the influence of CO 2 . Subsequent to injection, CO 2 initially migrates along the fault plane into the siltstone formation near the outlet. Thereafter, it diffuses preferentially into formations exhibiting higher water content, a phenomenon attributable to CO 2 –water–rock interactions. The continuation of injection results in the propagation of further diffusion along the fault into adjacent formations, confirming that the fault zone acts as a high-permeability conduit. Moreover, the pore-pressure increase induced by CO 2 injection is identified as the primary driver of fault activity alteration, based on rock failure theory and fracture propagation mechanics. These findings enhance the understanding of CO 2 -induced fault responses and provide valuable guidance for the safe implementation of geological carbon storage.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yan et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: