Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Thermodynamic modeling reveals a geothermal system improves hydrogen and freshwater production while ensuring sustainability.
This study presents the design and analysis of an integrated, geothermal-powered system that simultaneously produces electricity, clean water, and green hydrogen. The system addresses global concerns over energy security and resource scarcity by fully utilizing a 180 °C geothermal source in a closed-loop manner. The geothermal fluid first drives a primary Organic Rankine Cycle for power generation. The residual heat is then directed to a Zero Liquid Discharge desalination unit to produce freshwater and recover salts. This purified water, along with a portion of the generated electricity, is fed into a Proton Exchange Membrane electrolyzer for high-purity hydrogen production. A secondary Organic Rankine Cycle further recovers remaining geothermal energy to boost efficiency. Thermodynamic and economic modeling reveal the system can generate significant outputs: approximately 2.7 MW of net electricity, 112.1 m³ /day of freshwater, and 218.1 kg/day of hydrogen. The thermodynamic model yields an overall system efficiency of 14.6% under base case operating conditions. Key factors influencing performance include the ZLD heat-source temperature, turbine pressures, and flow density of electrolyzer. Optimization of key parameters demonstrates the potential to elevate this efficiency to 16.8%. With an estimated investment of 3.69 MM$, the system is projected to achieve payback in under two years. By operating entirely on renewable geothermal energy and incorporating a fully closed-loop water cycle through Zero Liquid Discharge technology, this poly-generation system offers a sustainable, economically viable, and environmentally benign solution for the co-production of essential utilities. • Cascaded ORC design for efficient low-enthalpy geothermal utilization. • Direct coupling of ZLD desalinated water to PEM hydrogen production. • Integrated production of electricity, freshwater, and green hydrogen. • Rapid economic return (∼1.37 years payback). • Supports net-zero water and energy goals and resource circularity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hajian et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: