Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Developed biomimetic nano-system improves cognitive functions in traumatic brain injury via enhanced delivery, suggesting better treatment options.
Traumatic brain injury (TBI) induces a detrimental inflammatory microenvironment at the lesion site, which, together with neuronal death and loss, leads to neurological dysfunction. The blood–brain barrier (BBB) further impedes intracerebral drug delivery, posing a major challenge for post-TBI therapy. To overcome this, we developed a brain-targeted biomimetic nano-system (R/T-MaM-NPs) using an engineered dual-peptide-modified macrophage membrane (MaM). This system encapsulates neuroprotective ginsenoside Rg1 into poly (lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA)-based nanoparticles (NPs). RAW264.7 macrophages were engineered to co-express targeting peptides (RVG and T7) on their membranes; the derived R/T-MaM was then coated onto NPs. The MaM coating conferred high biocompatibility and biosafety, enabling R/T-MaM-NPs to reduce immune clearance and prolong systemic circulation. By leveraging the intrinsic inflammatory chemotaxis of MaM and dual-peptide targeting, the integrated system promoted traversal across the BBB and subsequent accumulation around the cerebral lesion, thereby inducing the transdifferentiation of reactive astrocytes (RAs) into electrophysiologically functional neuron-like cells (NLCs). RNA sequencing confirmed significant upregulation of neurogenic genes in R/T-MaM-NP-treated RAs, an outcome closely linked to suppression of the Wnt/Notch signaling pathway. Furthermore, R/T-MaM-NPs remodeled the inflammatory microenvironment at the TBI site, alleviated cerebral edema, and enhanced the recovery of cognitive and motor functions in TBI mice.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liao et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: